【劉悅笛、趙強】從“生一包養網站涯美學”到“情本哲學”

requestId:68499ab6df43f8.48642244.

From “career aesthetics” to “emotional philosophy” – Interview with Liu Qingdi Research Institute of Philosophy of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences

Author: Liu Qingdi, Zhao Qiang

Source: Author Authorized by Confucian Network Release, Originally published by “Social Scientist” Issue 2, 2018

Time: Confucius was the second day of the third month of Wuxu in the year 2569, Jimao

           Jesus April 17, 2018

Abstract: This article is an interview with Liu Lie Di, a researcher at the Institute of Philosophy of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, and sorts out the academic development process of Liu Lie Di from aesthetics to Chinese thinking. In the field of aesthetics, Liu Lidi strives to discuss one history and one discussion: the historical aspect is “analysis of aesthetics”, and conducted historical reviews and in-depth discussions on the aesthetics doors that occupy the mainstream of the East in the second half of the 20th century; the discussion aspect is “career aesthetics”, which has constructed a complete set of “career aesthetics” theories in the integration of the Chinese and Western thinking and vision, and thus consolidated it on the historical basis of Chinese tradition. Liu Qingdi became the term “Aesthetics as the first philosophy”, but he believed that “aesthetics” here has transcended the definition of the East. Aesthetics is not only a sense of “rational learning” in the Eastern style, but also a sense of perception of oriental perception. Aesthetics is “sensation-feeling” learning. He was deeply influenced by Li Zehou’s early thinking of “love-based body”, Liu Qingdi has turned to the “love-based philosophy” in recent years. The experiment was based on the living experience of “career world” and built on the basis of China’s “one world” rather than the “two worlds” in the East. He used the integration of principles as the core of thinking to build the Chinese “love-based philosophy” or “love-based Confucianism” for the people. Facing the anti-nature renewal of Chinese traditions in the present day, what Confucianism revived is not only the perceptual “tradition of gifts”, but also the rational “tradition of joy”. After the tradition of joy was transformed into the “tradition of love” of the Chinese people. “Confucianism is the origin of the friendship between gifts and advocating the unity of reason.

Keywords: Career Aesthetic Aesthetic Aesthetic Aesthetic Aesthetic Aesthetic Aesthetic Aesthetic Aesthetic Aesthetic Aesthetic Aesthetic Aesthetic Aesthetic Aesthetic Aesthetic Aesthetic

Zhao Strong (hereinafter referred to as Zhao): Teacher Liu, you are the most powerless advocate and promoter of “career aesthetics” in China today. I remember that at the beginning of the New Century, you focused on the review of daily careers and proposed a very important point: the relationship between aesthetics and daily careers. Over the years, you have clearly put forward the concept of career theory construction in the current aesthetic theory. It can be said that it is a unique story in the Chinese aesthetics community. Can you talk about the academic engine and standpoint that strives to construct “career aesthetics”?

Liu Flute (hereinafter referred to as Liu): In fact, the structure of “career aesthetics” was earlier than the daily career review and discussion that began in 2003. Before the discussion, the original “career aesthetics” theory was already constructed, and the basic thinking was mainly constructed in 2001. In my 2005 book “Career Aesthetics”, in order to respond to this debate, I added a chapter “Daily Career Review and Appreciation Daily Career Review”, but I only regard it as a historic outlook for the “Career Aesthetics” appearance. I think that daily career review is the artisticization of contemporary career, and aesthetics daily career translation is the artisticization of contemporary art. The daily career review is a very influential argument, which has formed a broader range of academic disciplines in literature and arts, but for aesthetics, it is a natural theory shift, which allows us to return to our career world to rethink the basic problems of aesthetics. However, the final structure of “career aesthetics” did not develop from history, but developed based on the thinking of philosophers. It was first inspired by Huthier’s early “career world” theory, and at the same time there were influences from Heidegger, Dewey, and Wittgenstein. They were not only sectarian figures who existed, used, and analytical philosophy, but also included the orientation of returning to their careers in the deep level of thinking. This is what we call “career theory turn”. This led me to the construction of “career aesthetics” from philosophy. The doctoral thesis was completed very early in 2003 because I borrowed the Chinese literary mission in 2001. I worked for one year and one perfect doctoral thesis for two years, and then I came to this debate. However, for aesthetics as philosophy, “career aesthetics” is the construction of the intrinsic theory, not the problem of the expansion of the border. Of course, the border of aesthetics has also been expanded. From the perspective of connotation, the borders of aesthetics must have expanded to a more broad career world, but this is even more a change in connotation, which is the same as the transformation to career in philosophy.